New Research Calls Global Warming Data 'Not Reality'

New Research Calls Global Warming Data 'Not Reality':
"A new report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data generated by NASA and the NOAA found that it's complete bunk.

The paper was peer-reviewed by some notable scientists with some pretty impressive credentials who agree with the report's conclusions.
Among them: (click for long list)
The authors of the study, Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. Joseph S. D’Aleo, and Dr. Craig D. Idso, have reached some devastating conclusions:

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. 

 It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.
And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. 

This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.
...The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. 

In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. 

Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.
Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. 

(Full Abstract Report)..."